Posts Tagged “twitter”

There are people on Twitter who occasionally take a break from the madness and go silent for a bit. These people do so, in my opinion, to clear their minds and their days from the constant pull of messages that flow in front of them. This conveyor belt of information isn’t that hard to ignore, or is it?

TwitterJeff

I decided to take a day – a day where I had a bunch of deadlines – and slip away from Twitter for a while. I still created tweet-length missives, but I saved them all in a text file (they’re pasted below) instead of putting them out in the ether.

The two folks that come to mind when I think of Twitter hater, unfollowers (who then follow Twitter again) are Ari Herzog and Robert Scoble.

Robert went over to FriendFeed for a bit and then came back – albeit a little less loquacious than before.

Ari went away and then came back and then went away and then came back. In the midst of all this he unfollowed everyone and then refollowed some folks. He has reasons and rhymes for all his moves. See those at his blog.

Enough blathering. here’s what I would have said had I been on Twitter today. I’ll be back on tonight in case you missed me.

Today’s the experiment day. Gonna collect my tweets in a .pages document and then post them all as a blog entry. Feel free to comment.

Why do so many shampoo manufacturers make paper labels to go on their product? Heads-up, these bottles are in a wet, paper-destroying environment.

Wearing my Breckenridge t-shirt today. Maybe people will think I’m from Colorado and ask me questions about the wild west.

Already got one comment on my announcement (of this experiment) @chucktanowitz wanted to know why. I say it’s good blog fodder and will keep me focused on work today.

@gradontripp This is amazing. I have had to remain vigilant not to open up Tweetdeck, Seismic, Tweetie or Twitter.

Worried about the #meatcats. @clownface3 hurt her back and can’t save them from danger, and I’m headed to Panera to do some work – might even chance Barnes & Noble cc: @chrisbrogan

Cooking waffles for breakfast. Not sure if I can Tumble my food today as I’m off of Twitter. Guess I’ll take photos and post them tomorrow. #wwjce

Cats are back in. I’m off to the satellite office. NOT THE Satellite Office, but Panera in Hingham.

@jetblue – we have a team of people from Boston going to SXSW in March. We’re all on the same flight on 3/12. We’d LOVE some drink tickets if you have any around. Thx!

Nearly freaked out when I realized March is MADNESS for me. 4th I’m in Wichita. 9th I’m in Chicago. 12-16 I’m in Austin. 26-27 I’m in Saratoga. Yikers. How do people like @peterkim @adamcohen and @schneidermike do it?

One project wrapped up. Now on to a couple others. Trying to breathe. Glad it’s not scooter weather yet. Would be major-league distracted.

My favorite blog right now is Tyson Goodridge’s – http://enterdialogue.com – it’s awesome when it comes to distilling intelligence. Good work!

Just cooked some Pot Stickers and was reprimanded by one of the people who lives in the house. She pointed out that the Pot Stickers were going to be part of dinner. It’s now 3:24 and we’re Pot Sticker destitute.

Now gobbling pretzels and waking up @clownface3 – She’s asked me to be quieter in my consumption. I told her that I was getting a fist for punching.* (see The Office)

Projects 62% done. VERY happy so far. Now on to some audio editing for a client. The fun doesn’t stop.

Seems like airlines are getting slammed on Twitter. First Southwest and now United. Sounds like some companies need to listen.

Just looked at @bostonmarketer and realized she’s about 1000 followers ahead of me. She deserves more. Great content and winning smile all the time.

Got any experiments you’re doing with Social Media? Share them in the comments!

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »

January 1 is a time for gyms to fill up, for hangover cures to be tested and for a mindset of renewal to take place. As a child we used to giggle at my father’s assertion that he was perfect and therefore didn’t need to focus on resolutions or improvement. After embracing this attitude we’d don our ski clothes and hit the slopes (New Year’s morning is the absolute best time to ski because skiers party hard and the mountains remain empty on January 1 until about noon).

EmptyMountain

Find the original photo HERE

Used with Creative Commons Permission.

As I look back and admit that I’m not quite perfect, I wanted to thank the people in social media who have had an influence on me since I’ve been actively splashing about in the fishbowl. I’m not going to rush all the way back to 1997 when I started a Web rehab firm with two friends, or to 1999 when I began blogging, or even to my first tweet three years ago.

What I will do is share a neat little tool with you and then list out all my Twitter friends – barring some random Twitter burp that has purged people from my list. It’s my take on a massive, New Year’s Day Follow Friday. The tool is called Tweetake and it allows you to backup your Twitter info. Tweets, people, faves, etc., all into a csv.xls file. That’s Excel for those of you unfamiliar with file extensions.

With that downloaded list, you can then organize this data any which way you choose. I choose to give you a massive list of linked names over the next few pages. If you follow me and don’t see your name there, leave a comment. If you see others you might want to follow, just click on their name and start following them. You’re empowered.

Aside from that, I want to wish everyone who reads any of my Jeff Cutler blogs (20+ and growing), or my traditional media writing (half a dozen outlets pay me to write these days), Keep Reading! That’s actually my main resolution this year. I’m not perfect – as much as I hoped heredity might have helped – and I definitely don’t read enough. To that end, please share links to things you think I should read. I’ll give them a look. Happy New Year!

*Because of memory issues, I’m breaking the list over four posts.

http://twitter.com/davidgallant

http://twitter.com/twitshot

http://twitter.com/SkipBensley

http://twitter.com/1GreatBuy

http://twitter.com/jeuvideo

http://twitter.com/BostonTweetUp

http://twitter.com/ThinkDynamik

http://twitter.com/mysticdave

http://twitter.com/cell49

http://twitter.com/engadgets

http://twitter.com/brynnadonn

http://twitter.com/peter_anton

http://twitter.com/imstuff

http://twitter.com/padsha

http://twitter.com/carbBlocker

http://twitter.com/Daroff

http://twitter.com/Garritt

http://twitter.com/TheModernPet

http://twitter.com/bloggerengadget

http://twitter.com/bigsaving

http://twitter.com/slowmack

http://twitter.com/energysection

http://twitter.com/cascokid

http://twitter.com/JoselinMane

http://twitter.com/Michellemmm

http://twitter.com/Adesoji

http://twitter.com/DRUNKHULK

http://twitter.com/BarbAtSea

http://twitter.com/ortman_social

http://twitter.com/MatingRoom

http://twitter.com/geethaz

http://twitter.com/jnmedien

http://twitter.com/markfrost

http://twitter.com/Ed

http://twitter.com/CircaPictures

http://twitter.com/nbainchina

http://twitter.com/johndrew25

http://twitter.com/lazarinkroni

http://twitter.com/Webpilots

http://twitter.com/BobChinns

http://twitter.com/RetardedDwarf

http://twitter.com/StevenRothberg

http://twitter.com/CharlesRoberson

http://twitter.com/timoriley

http://twitter.com/morgankr

http://twitter.com/dennisbest

http://twitter.com/countrywine

http://twitter.com/pnv123

http://twitter.com/walterjones45

http://twitter.com/leximo

http://twitter.com/drunktwt

http://twitter.com/Art_Velez

http://twitter.com/mz_rocko

http://twitter.com/schmitt_it

http://twitter.com/jimcarroll

http://twitter.com/CheyanneBrae

http://twitter.com/jeffespo

http://twitter.com/dealsplus

http://twitter.com/aipmm

http://twitter.com/glorialynnglass

http://twitter.com/TVSassone

http://twitter.com/onlinesneh

http://twitter.com/ecashncapture

http://twitter.com/kodakCB

http://twitter.com/Josh_Litchfield

http://twitter.com/BeverlySchmitt

http://twitter.com/mavenbook

http://twitter.com/woadraider

http://twitter.com/witnessemptysky

http://twitter.com/CliveWild

http://twitter.com/bantershire

http://twitter.com/cruciformity

http://twitter.com/ScottBourne

http://twitter.com/Nikifashion

http://twitter.com/EugeneGregorio

http://twitter.com/SteampunkRings

http://twitter.com/nerdpass

http://twitter.com/JeremiahCharles

http://twitter.com/JoeySantiago

http://twitter.com/fiazio

http://twitter.com/cpudan

http://twitter.com/apunge

http://twitter.com/trex554

http://twitter.com/arthurcooper

http://twitter.com/NewPrankCalls

http://twitter.com/monikkinom

http://twitter.com/Franck_Briand

http://twitter.com/mooifood

http://twitter.com/FrankCarillo

http://twitter.com/BubblesAndSoap

http://twitter.com/AlfredStehbeck

http://twitter.com/labusque

http://twitter.com/Favstar

http://twitter.com/globenetcom

http://twitter.com/atomicpoet

http://twitter.com/niney123

http://twitter.com/mayank

http://twitter.com/VisalusRep

http://twitter.com/tismichael

http://twitter.com/RobertUmpleby

http://twitter.com/infoimp

http://twitter.com/gravityjack

http://twitter.com/KickMix

http://twitter.com/aroach

http://twitter.com/FlickrExplored

http://twitter.com/Pierre_Paperon

http://twitter.com/twittamazing

http://twitter.com/GUNGACartoons

http://twitter.com/spf13

http://twitter.com/seanphurley

http://twitter.com/JoyOfSoxMovie

http://twitter.com/artmarco


Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments 7 Comments »

You hear it almost daily, the urging by others to ‘keep it real’. But what’s that saying mean? Is there some other way to be?

Unfortunately, yes. In an age where there’s immediacy in all our communications and something we share can instantly be viewed and archived by others, there’s a reason to be more deliberate in our words and actions.

It’s simple to offend people just by saying the wrong thing or by typing an innocuous email or sharing a context-free photo. But are these offenses or simple missteps? Back when you wrote a letter or a postcard, or had phones that seldom dropped calls or inserted static at inopportune times, you didn’t have the same misunderstandings.

Picture 4

So, do we blame the lack of perspective and the prevailing hurt feelings on technology? Or is it the result of an ever-increasing pace of life. Or further, is it just softer skins on people who don’t know how to communicate IRL so their social media and online relationships also lack perspective?

I’ve asked a lot of questions here because I’m curious about the drivers of human behavior.

Confused? Am I being too obtuse? Then let’s use a hypothetical…

Bob and Sharon are joking around on the beach. Sharon sees Bob walking past the women’s changing rooms and takes a picture with her phone. Then she adds it to Twitter and shares it with the world – or her 2000 followers – with the caption, “Bob commits a foul by using the girls’ room to change.”

Picture 5

Clearly to Sharon it’s a joke.

Clearly to anyone standing there, it’s a joke.

But Bob goes off the deep end when he find out that Sharon did this horrible thing to his good name. He worries that all of Sharon’s followers and essentially the whole world now believe he would do something as heinous as use the ladies room.

What’s your take?

A. Should Bob pledge to make Sharon’s life miserable every chance he gets because she had fun at Bob’s expense? In a single Tweet? On a single day? Where maybe 10% of Sharon’s followers might see it? Where only the folks following both Bob and Sharon would see the joke?

B. Should Bob let it go and chalk up the experience to Sharon not fully understanding how sensitive Bob was about his image?

C. Should both Bob and Sharon go to remedial social media school to learn how to communicate using the tools of today?

D. Should the event have warranted even these 79 words I’ve used to describe them?

THAT’s what I’m talking about when I wonder if people are being too focused on the way they’re perceived and not focused enough on just being good people.

There are situations like this going on every day and I’ve got one word for the people who are taking themselves so seriously.

Seriously?

Have you run into someone who thinks they’re a bigger deal than they are; or who clearly doesn’t understand how to communicate? Please share those experiences in the comments.

And if you’re out and about tomorrow in Boston and looking for something to do, put this on your tweetup calendar…see Gary Vaynerchuk, Mike Langford, Thomas Edwards and me at the Estate. We’re Wining Dining and Signing. Tickets are still available.

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

What do you think of when you hear “strategic partnership”? Do you envision Coke and a movie theater franchise? Or a mattress manufacturer and a chiropractor? Or even a spedometer design firm and the local traffic enforcement brigade?

Whatever the alliance, it’s easy to see how some complementary arrangements develop. The same holds true in social media marketing, but the lines are a bit blurred.

Does it make sense for ad agencies to partner with social media trainers? Perhaps. Especially if the agency is still developing its menu of services.

How about a restaurant and a social media marketing agency? Maybe if the agency has some traditional background as well.

And what about similarly skilled pro’s in this social media space? Would you want to form a collaborative with folks who are blessed with the same skills? Isn’t that the same as putting 12 dentists in the same medical building or Quizno’s, Subway and D’Angelo’s side by side in a strip mall?

Maybe not.

In this evolving space, people bring a lot to the table that’s beneath the surface. My friend Mike Langford could teach businesses how to use social media tools as well as my friend Gradon Tripp. They both know the tools and both have the same exposure. But Mike brings a financial services and investing utility belt to the table while Gradon puts design acumen on the table.

Who’s better to teach Fidelity? Maybe Mike.

Who’s better to teach IKEA? Maybe Gradon.

Then what about the fish in this bowl who don’t have a background? Those gurus who are only versed in the tools? Are they worth hiring?

It’s an interesting question. Unlike employers who were on a “hire any liberal arts graduate” kick a few years ago because they were looking for balance instead of tunnel-vision, the market has swayed the other way. The more quills in your quiver, the better poised you are to deliver value to any client.

If four of us know the tools equally well, but only one of us has experience in multiple other fields, who would you pick to do your work or conduct your training?

Isn’t it in a company’s best interest to take a harder look at the entire package they’re purchasing than to jump at the shiny new object?

Hey, I like the $1000/hour gigs as much as the next guy, but I’d be dishonest if I told you I knew the history of Fred Olmsted and his contributions to local and national open spaces. And I’d be doing everyone in this social media specialty a disservice if I still went forward and bungled a job that would have benefited from that knowledge.

Maybe it’s time for every guru to look around and ask what else they bring to the table before they jump at the chance to talk to anyone who will pay them to explain ‘the twitter’.

And maybe it is time for us to start collaborating and forming the partnerships that allow us to offer more robust services. The rising tide is bringing all boats higher, but that could change pretty quick if we don’t share some of the wealth.

Because if you go it alone and scare off enough companies with your incompetence or narrow skillset you make it hard on the rest of us.

I’m not worried about me, I’ve got a finance guy, some political people, a printer, designer, CFO and some CMOs and agency people in my camp. But wouldn’t it be great if everyone were happy?

What do you think? Should we just let the market decide by chewing up and spitting out the idiot gurus? Or is it time for the partnerships to begin?

I welcome your comments.

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

As you know if you’ve been to my professional site, I’ve been training businesses and individuals in the use of social media tools for almost a year.

Some of my clients have included the National Association of Women Business Owners, the Society of Professional Journalists and even local chambers of commerce.

I just ran across something a colleague of mine is doing and I love it. Truly.

Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

You’ve seen the books in the self-help section of Barnes and Noble or Borders.

Who Moved My Cheese

Don’t Sweat The Small Stuff

All I Needed To Know About Social Media I Learned Over A Danish At SMB13

Popular titles, all. But the one thing they have in common is the strength of the storytelling. To get someone to pay attention to you, your company, your product, your prowess, your demands and your opinion, you should tell your story in a convincing way.

Take for instance Willie Wonka. Without the golden ticket promotion or the fact he had imprisoned some short factory workers, he was just another guy with a chocolate river, a glass elevator and a weird time-machine boat. But he could tell a story.

Let’s take a harder look at the candy magnate’s modus operandi and see if we can apply some of the lessons he taught to your life in the social media sphere.

Hey, Oprah, Ashton, Today Show, Brookstone, Fat Cat Quincy and others, this might help you connect with your social media audience a little more effectively. So listen up.

1 – Don’t be predictable.

Mr. Wonka looked conservative and staid in his suit, top-hat and cane. But he wasn’t afraid to use an impromptu gymnastics move to recharge his audience and get their attention.

*If you haven’t seen the movie, Wonka sticks his cane in the bricks, feigns losing his balance and somersaults forward toward the locked gates of his chocolate factory with the entire town and multiple media outlets standing outside. They gasp and then cheer and he captures their hearts. Touching.

Convert this to apply to your social media strategy. Your company can remain as laced-up as you want when it comes to traditional media and marketing, but if you want to reach a new audience go to them. Wonka new the people thought he was a reclusive, unapproachable soul. He reached them by being human.

So get out there and converse with your communities. And from time to time, refresh yourself in their eyes by stepping out and doing something unpredictable.

e.g – (after each section I’ll give a real-world example that could help a company) How great, and how much buzz would Dunkin Donuts generate if they gave away free coffee to their Facebook Fans one day? Nobody else gets the free coffee, only FB fans.

2 – Don’t make missteps (or at least prepare for the fallout as best you can)

As part of his process of searching for a successor, Wonka invites five children into his factory for a tour. During this tour he allows them enough chocolate, blueberry gum, golden eggs, fizzy lifting drink and other accoutrement to eliminate them as candidates.

They fall one by one and soon nobody is left to take over the chocolate factory.*

*no spoilers here.

The world of social media shrinks the world and speeds up the flow of information. If your company is doing something wrong, stop now and get ready for the eventual (because it will happen) backlash. Social media people will recognize these names – Skittles, Domino’s and KFC (thanks Oprah).

Either poorly thought out or poorly responded to crises, these companies all got dinged by something as simple as a hashtag or a RT (@oprah, that means Retweet. It’s when someone repeats what someone else on Twitter says. It’s the viral way for a message about free chicken to cause massive food shortages as the world’s largest chicken chain.)

So, when you make a mistake and create a new return policy on massage chairs or decide that you’re not going to let a Nine Inch Nails application in your iTunes App Store, be ready for the public response.

When in doubt, pretend that you’ve made this decision public on all TV shows, in all newspapers and magazines and on all Websites across the world. Then see how you might handle it differently. Because people will find out.

3 – Keep an eye out for unlikely partnerships

While it was a manufactured misdirection, the association of Slugworth and Wonka was one that seemed so unlikely that little Charlie was aghast when he saw Slugworth near the end of the movie.

Wonka found that it was important to remain friendly and cooperative with the majority of people within his sphere of influence because it was beneficial to the chocolate plant and to him personally.

In social media, don’t just ignore someone because you can’t see their worth right away. Take a moment to explore the different facets of a person’s background and skillset before you dismiss them.

A real example for me was landing a gig writing content for a pharmaceutical community site. The company had assigned me to work on a community for one condition without knowing my background. When I mentioned that I had a chronic illness, the hiring professional stopped in her tracks and decided to move me to a community they were creating specifically for that disease.

Now the company is getting a deal and receiving richer content because I can spend less time on research and use more billable hours writing.

Is there a takeaway to this? Should you model your social media-aware business on the stylings of a guy who breaks into song everytime he wants to teach a lesson?

My comment is to keep your eyes and ears open. Learn from everyone you meet. And find people who can show you the proper way to communicate with the tools of today.

Keep reading…sweet dreams.

AUTHOR’S NOTE: A lot of people ask me where my ideas come from and how I can create so much content across so many channels. The content production just comes from knowing the vehicles and using them correctly – and from 20 years as a professional journalist and freelance writer. The ideas, they come from everywhere. This column was sparked – literally – by my mistake of putting a FastBreak candy bar in the microwave. I asked myself aloud if Willie Wonka would have done that and out popped this piece. See photos below for the aftermath.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

In the world of technology and social media events, we’ve gotten complacent about entry and registration fees. The community has come to realize that content can vary greatly and that a for-fee model doesn’t always guarantee quality.

In fact, some of the functions I’ve attended that offered the best intelligence and networking were entirely free and even included beverages and food. The caveat is that these ‘free’ events are usually underwritten by a sponsor who sees some value in bringing the social media community together.

They also get a list of attendees – nothing to sneeze at in an era where lead-generation efforts can cost firms up to $500 per qualified lead. And they also get a bump in SEO and link juice because people like me tweet, blog and podcast about my experiences and connections facilitated by this free event.

Poking around online, I found that Twitter folks had strong opinions…

Stuart Foster said, “I think it’s totally cool as long as the fees are clearly outlined and the reason for charging them is also outlined.”

Don Martelli said, “I dont mind the reg fees just as long as 1. thr will be real SM uses explained that I cn learn from 2. attendee list is solid. It’s a no brainer. just lk twttr & other SM nets, it’s all abt the content & the ppl. otherwise, it’s just a lot of yappin.”

Rachel Levy said, “I think it’s perfectly fine. If people don’t want to pay, they won’t attend, and it will probably limit attendance.”

Mike Shea rounded out the group saying, “I would love to see more free ones, but charging fees usually makes a better event, so it makes sense to. But as a college student, the fees have stopped me from attending.”

Gaining such a perspective helps me understand and schedule my tour of events. I love to swing by a TweetUp and pop in on a TechTuesday or MobileMonday session. But I also see some value in organized events being a little financially exclusive.

If you want access to a musical artist, you pay money for their concert. If you want to see a movie, you pay a fee to be entertained. Why should being informed be any different?

We pay for college classes, we pay for continuing education, we pay to learn a language when we’re going to another country. Is delving into the minds of the social media leadership that different?

Clearly, I’m straddling the fence. I want free drinks and food. I want people who can spark my imagination and fulfill my need for knowledge. But I also want to keep money in my wallet.

What’s created this sudden angst after five years in the social media space? Just the steady increase in paid events on my calendar.

It used to be that you could go to Podcamp for free. The unconference model – a contradiction – was that the conference would form itself based on the desires and needs of the attendees. I’m pretty certain that the attendees didn’t need to start paying $50 to attend what was once a free gathering of podcasting enthusiasts. But it happened.

Social Media Breakfasts started out free and now incorporate a symbolic charge of about $8 to ensure attendance and an accurate headcount (I think podcamp could have done the same thing – people are loathe to part with much more than $5 so an $8 fee would have cemented an audience).

One Web/social media entrepreneur has become an artist at pimping a social event and then turning it into a paid conference. The key there is to get on the speaker list so you can attend for free or to linger around the Web and see if the content is shared via live tweets, Web streaming or archived info.

And some of the larger learning sessions have gone the way of the traditional tradeshow. They’re now called summits and labs and camps, but they’re finally focusing on making some money from the increasing participation in the social media space.

Just this week I signed up for an event – What’s Next in Tech – and was surprised to see a $40 pricetag on it. The attendee and speaker list was similar to the crowd I see at WBUR TweetUps and around town at other free events. For $40 attendees weren’t even getting open bar – a pleasant perk and numerous free Boston events.

As a journalist, I played that card and am attending as a member of the media. But what is the driver for someone else to register and part with $40?

I asked that of Shayne Gilbert, one of the organizers for What’s Next in Tech: Exploring the Growth Opportunities of 2009 and Beyond. *You can find conference details HERE.

**Gilbert reminded me after I first posted this that they are offering scholarships to the event – just see the event site link above for details.**

I told Shayne I had gotten a few comments already from people who wanted to know what their $40 would buy at this ‘next in tech’ event. Here’s our conversation…

JC: Who is this event best suited for?

SG: People currently looking for their next career opportunity, starting companies, or investing in start-ups. Also, recently graduated students. We want to have a conversation that’s focused on the future of technology here in Massachusetts.

JC: How will job seekers benefit by attending?

SG: Our goal is to provide a picture — with help from our speakers and attendees — of where the growth opportunities are in tech right now.

JC: What level of tech knowledge should an attendee possess?

SG: There’s no pre-requisite here. The conversation will be accessible to anyone.

JC: How will questions for the panels be taken?

SG: Live, from people in attendance.

JC: What is provided (food/drink/facilities/materials)?

SG: Light appetizers & cash bar.

JC: What new tech outlets will be present?

SG: Several local bloggers, ZDNet, Boston Globe.

JC: What should someone hope to get out of this?

SG: Ideas and inspiration about where the tech industry in New England is heading.

JC: Would an iPhone app developer benefit as much as a venture capitalist or a CMO of a local company?

SG: Hmmm… inclined to say yes. But the event isn’t really designed for CMOs.

JC: How was this event developed?

SG: We put together a number of local conferences like the annual Nantucket Conference on Entrepreneurship & Innovation, and the Future Forward Executive Retreat. But we hadn’t really done any events that were open to everyone, relatively inexpensive, and focused on what happens right now. Hopefully, it will be useful both to people looking for their next gig, and people starting their next company.

I’m not really sure if the knowledge is worth it, but I’ll be there sharing my experiences via Twitter if you don’t have the cash to plunk down. Shayne did tell me that the $40 is a discounted price only available until this Friday, May 15. Then it goes up.

Ultimately, I’m still going to see where I can save money as I sail my social media ship through all the events I can find. But the way I’ve started to think about things is in possible ROI. If I meet one person that hires me to work 20 minutes for them, I’ve made my money back.

Or if I can get in as a member of the media AND sell the article, I’ll be way ahead of the game.

You’re going to have to decide if $8, $40, $50 or $1000’s are your limit when trying to make more connections in the social media world.

Maybe I should just start tweeting to my friend Ashton and ask him to hire me to write his biography. I’d get to spend some time in California and I’m pretty sure he’d pay me more than $40.

Keep reading…

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments 5 Comments »

It’s Friday, April 17, 2009. You’ve just turned off the TV and you’re excited because Oprah Winfrey just showed you that Tweeting on Twitter is easy. After seeing Oprah’s short conversation with Ashton Kutcher, you’re convinced that tweeting is going to connect you to vast communities of people.

These groups will inform, entertain and support you. And you’ll do the same for the people in those communities. But it’s not really that easy.

People use Twitter in different ways. As do businesses, organizations, governments and news outlets. Even the celebrity contingent is getting into the fray – as we’ve seen. But a lot of people are stumbling and the first thing to do to eliminate the stumbles is to figure out why you want to use this messaging or micro-blogging tool.

Some people use it to stay in touch with friends and family.

Some use it to find new friends, arrange social events and connect with organizations and businesses.

Companies are using it to pimp their products, market to customers and to strengthen their brand.

PR professionals are all over Twitter trying to find out how this free tool can help them make a buck. They’re also trying to figure out how to reach journalists and bloggers via tweets.

Journalists are here using Twitter to inform and report. They’re also here looking for sources (symbiosis between PR and journalists) for stories.

And celebrities are here because it’s hot and new. They’re also here because it gives them more power than they might have had before in reaching and interacting with their fanbase.

But there are rules and techniques everyone should know about using Twitter. Here’s my bootcamp version of what Twitter can and can’t do and how you can navigate some of the unwritten rules of this unique social media tool.

Let’s dive right in. I’m going to go through these top-of-mind, so read the entire column to see if I’ve addressed a concern or question. If not, leave me a comment and I’ll respond to it with an answer or a resource that you can use to learn more.

Twitter is for everyone. Naysayers abound, but if you want to be on Twitter, jump on. You’re probably going to make some mistakes and get banged up, but it really is like riding a bike. Get on and get dirty. Write some tweets and see what comes back. It’s really the best way to figure out how to use it.

Only follow the people you want to follow. Some people get on a high horse about follower/following ratio (I do for some clients actually) but if you’re just using Twitter to connect with friends and family and maybe some social groups, go wild. Follow the fun people and listen to what they say.

*Basics like how to follow people and how to compose a tweet are covered in the upcoming book Laura Fitton is authoring for Wiley and it’s already listed on Amazon.

In the meanwhile, to follow someone just click on their Twitter name in the EVERYONE stream on Twitter. If you like what you see, click FOLLOW and you’ll then see their updates in your HOME stream.

*I use the word stream to mean the list of updates that flow down your screen. Here’s a shot of my recent Twitter stream…

Abbreviations can mean actions or words and they can be confusing. Here are some you should know.

RT means Retweet – or the act of sharing an update that someone else put on Twitter first. The format of a retweet is…. RT: @jeffcutler The #redsox won today and I loved the game. Even got a foul ball, FTW!

In that retweet, you can tell that @jeffcutler was the original author. That he was allowing others to search for the word REDSOX (use of the # symbol before a word) and that he was thrilled about the foul ball (FTW means For The Win or YAY).

RR means Rerun. I was part of the four people that decided to start this abbreviation on Twitter. Steve Garfield, Greg Verdino, Melissa Pierce and I were chatting over breakfast in Las Vegas in January when we wondered how people could retweet themselves without looking pompous. I shouted out Rerun and the rest is history.

Now, if you want to retweet yourself, just put RR in front of a tweet. Use RR: instead of RT: and you’re all set.

Most often, people RR tweets when the first occurrence may have been either too early or late to be seen by many people. Or maybe a RR is in order if there are other events being shared on Twitter that render your little message insignificant. For instance, when the plan landed on the Hudson River, every other tweet not dealing with the crash landing was ignored. In that case, I would be busy Rerunning the important stuff the next day.

Oh, that @ symbol. That’s what goes before anyone you want to address on Twitter. If your username is jeffcutler, then the way people would get in touch with you is by typing @jeffcutler. In the case of Oprah Winfrey, her Twitter handle (name) is Oprah and you can address her by typing @oprah into a tweet.

Answer questions. As often as you can, take the time to look at your replies (any message that is @YOURNAME) and then respond to it. I like to look at my @’s a few times a day and give reasoned and valuable responses to them. If you help people a lot, they’ll happily help you when you have questions.

Anytime you type a message @ someone, this is out in the open for anyone on Twitter to see. It also shows up in a person’s @MYNAME field, sort of like an inbox. See circled name in this screen shot – that’s where you’d click to see all @’s to you.

DMs. While the majority of tweets are publicly visible, DMs are the Twitter equivalent of private messages. BUT, you can only send DMs to people who are following you. DMs are a great way to share info you don’t want the entire Twittersphere to see.

140 characters. Yep, it’s all about the characters – not the people on Twitter but the actual number of characters in a tweet. You only have 140 characters in which to make your point. If you go over, Twitter will truncate or shorten your post. SO make your tweets short and sweet.

*The character count includes names, abbreviations and the characters in all links.

There are assorted tools online that allow you to shorten URLs, but I’m not going to digress into side lessons about using the Internet. Back to Twitter.

When you’re on Twitter, you’ll be well served to spend about 80%+ of your time sharing, conversing, responding, retweeting and reading. People on Twitter – as in many communities – want you to care about them. But there’s got to be give and take. If you give more than you take then people will gravitate toward you and you’ll gain more resources from which to learn.

Simply put, if you give more than you take, then Twitter will treat you correctly. The companies and people who just spit out links, pimp their blogs and press, and blatantly use Twitter as a PR vehicle see diminishing returns and eventually lose any followers of any worth.

My advice is to treat this social media tool as a way to meet new people and learn about them. Take my word for it, you’ll see how well sharing and contributing works.

Random Thoughts….

Is what you’re sharing on Twitter part of a conversation? Can you really make friends here? What makes Twitter better than the phone, txt messages, blogging or even email?

I’ve been using Twitter since March 2007. I started introducing people to the tool and creating content specifically for the 140-character constraints since day one. Recently I’ve also been tabbed to present Twitter for Business sessions for the National Association of Women Business Owners, and social media tools for journalists for the annual conference of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Continue the conversation or get out. Two examples… A friend of mine was pretty active on Twitter for about four months. He was gathering followers and building a little community of people with whom he could talk and bounce ideas off of.

He was benefiting from the expertise of that group and was holding up his end by sharing his knowledge. Then he got bored and left Twitter for three months. Now he’s having the worst time getting back into the conversations.

People he used to chat with have dropped him because they see him as someone who used them and wasn’t reliable. Now he wants back in as if nothing happened. When the investment people have in you is predominantly digital, you’re only as memorable or as valuable as you most recent exchanges.

His trail has gone cold and now he’s going to have to work twice as hard to get back into the community. Especially now that Twitter is growing so fast.

The second example is that of a restaurant on the South Shore. This company made a splash on Twitter and touted themselves as the best destination for Valentine’s Day. I was excited to see them enter the fray and was hopeful that they would continue to interact with customers. I was even hoping they might run specials for Twitterers that the general public wouldn’t see.

Not happening at all. This restaurant hasn’t tweeted since February and even recent tweets to them haven’t been responded to. They aren’t aware of, or maybe they don’t care, that this segment of their marketing plan is falling flat.

I advise two restaurants on their use of social media – including Facebook, Twitter and blogs – and the one thing I tell them at the outset is not to get into the game if they can’t dedicate time and resources to social media. I say that social media is a long-term investment and it won’t show returns for possibly as long as other traditional advertising or marketing efforts.

If they’re not going to tweet regularly, they shouldn’t even tweet the first time.

Finally, WWOD? What would Oprah do? Well, if I had the chance to speak with Oprah about her use of Twitter, I’d advise her to spend a lot of time on it. I’d say that she should follow only the people who interest her, but not to be focused on numbers.

I’d tell her, Twitter is jam-packed with interesting, skilled and fun people. They’re willing to share and smile with you and they expect the same. Honor that trust and contribute what you can.

And I’d say that if she doesn’t personally have time to interact, not to use it. She’s got enough going on in her life and media empire that Twitter would probably be a distraction.

That said, I might point her in the direction of her handlers or other content creation specialists. These people could coordinate messaging, updates and info that would assuage the demand of her viewers/followers and would probably allow Oprah to benefit from this versatile too.

I hope that the influx of millions of users take the time to each figure out how to use Twitter.

How about you? How is Twitter affecting your life online and offline? And what do you wish you knew about this social media tool?

What did I miss and what questions do you still have?

Find me on Twitter and @ me, I’ll answer your questions.

*EDITED – If you want to see some of what I tell my clients, here’s an 18-page packet of notes I used for a recent talk to 40 small business owners. Download the .pdf. All I ask is that you share this link with people on Twitter, leave a comment below, or link to this post on your blog. Thanks!

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments 8 Comments »

Earlier today, I retweeted a post about the ways in which Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk) and Oprah Winfrey (@oprah) were using Twitter incorrectly. This caught the attention of Ashton Kutcher – who I’m fairly confident does all his own tweeting – and he sent me a note.

He asked why I felt that his Tweeting technique was wrong. In that astonishing moment I was frank with him that I thought he was actually playing in the Twittersphere correctly but Oprah was naive and untrained in her use of this social media tool.

Be that interpretation what it is, the thing that surprised me the most was that this celebrity took the time to interact. Ashton Kutcher sent me an @ message and then he followed me.

That’s right. The King (nay Jester) of Twitter – with 1.2Million followers added me to the list of people he’s following. I’m number 82.

Now this situation might change when Ashton realizes I like to talk about journalism and the Red Sox and that I’m barely versed in the nuances of today’s music. He might dislike people from Boston who ride scooters and sometimes report for NPR. And that might be the end of this journey and conversation with Ashton.

But I am a tech reporter and he likes to use technology, so I might linger. And this lingering might be a direct result of our open exchange on Twitter.

You see, within moments of his note to me, my email box became full and my own Twitter following count jumped up by 2%. That was within seconds. I wonder what might happen when we talk again…on a weekday…when more people see it.

How very crazy that the very power Ashton talked of during his interview with Oprah on Friday is manifesting itself right here in this very personal way.

What are your thoughts on this real and remarkable exchange?

What would you share with Ashton – or with Oprah – if they were following you?

What would you want them to share with you?

For now, I’m going to see what I can learn about the challenges of celebrity now that the walls have been removed. It’s intriguing and exciting to share some of that power Ashton spoke of last week.

I hope he keeps the conversation going.

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments 12 Comments »

Granted, many of the post titles here are a lot more descriptive than this one, but I’m sure you’ll get the imagery or the intent by the time you’re a little ways through the post. So, onward…

In a conversation I had with my GF the other day, she said, “You should definitely hitch your wagon to him.”

She was talking about a friend of mine. A guy who is fairly well-known in the social-media sphere and who has contacts elsewhere in business communities and the technology world.

Preliminarily I agreed. It’s never bad to know more people. It helps you maintain perspective – both personal and professional. It helps you reach new communities and audiences – fairly important when creating content for a variety of consumers. And having a variety of wagons around you – circa the old West – means that you’re ensconced in a protective and nurturing shield of like-minded and similarly driven entities.

But where does the fishbowl effect come in? When does each wagon start to look like the next one?

If you’re focused on the Boston social-media scene, you might ascribe any one of a dozen names to the person my girlfriend suggested. You’d likely be wrong. The person we were talking about was someone I got to know recently and someone who has far less influence than the recognized old-guard rockstars.

This guy has ideas about services and how to deliver them via the Web. He knows how to use and enjoy social media and is looking for partners in his quest.

It’s like watching the start of Lord of the Rings – or any film where a merry band of people gather together to take on the odds as a team.

Now let’s get to the butter.

For a while I’ve been an evangelist of social media tools. I’ve used most of them and have even taught individuals, businesses and educational institutions how to Tweet, Link and ‘Book. That’s not changing, but the thing that is – ever-so-slightly – is my focus on the future.

As Ashton Kutcher and Oprah delve into social media and drag it to the masses, there’s going to be a wave of demand for the skills I’ve built over the past five years.

Instead of being the scribe or content creator, I’ve shifted to the role of content coordinator. I’m now advising people about the content they should have and where they should have it. There’s a greater opportunity in that role – both for financial return and for sharing.

You see, if I just hitch my wagon to the superstars and feed Remora-like off their conquests nobody wins. If I ride alongside them and offer to pull people with my wagon, then the bread gets buttered on both sides for everyone.

The only reason I’m able to pull – and never lose sight of this – is that the rockstars have shared themselves and this is just my way to pay it forward…errr backward.

Look at your vehicle. Is it a wagon? If so, I urge you to offer someone a ride, too. You’ll both get where you’re going a little faster. Trust me.

Keep reading!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 4 Comments »

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.